COMPARING ELECTION SYSTEMS

The following chart compares several different election systems.
Election Systems Described
Voting System Malfunctions.

GOVERNMENT AND CANDIDATE FACTORS
VOTING SYSTEM -> PLURALITY


PLURALITY WITH RUNOFF


APPROVAL


APPROVAL WITH RUNOFF


BORDA OR CONDORCET RANKING


INSTANT RUNOFF


INDEPENDENT VOTING


FREE CHOICES RATING


CHARACTERISTIC
METHOD DESCRIBED: Vote for only 1 choice. Vote for only 1 choice.

If none > 50%, best 2 have plurality runoff.
Vote for all choices liked. Vote for all choices liked.

If none > 50%, best 2 have plurality runoff.
Rank from best to worst. Scoring systems used differ Rank from best to worst.

If all < 50%, lowest choice eliminated by rounds
Vote on each choice:
YES, NO
(or abstain by not choosing)
Rate each choice as integer:
from −-5 to +5.
from −10 to +10
from −50 to +50
STATISTICAL BALLOT TYPE: Pie chart
pie chart
2 pie charts
2 pie charts
Column chart
column chart
Column and pie
col and pie chart
Pie chart
pie chart
mult pie charts
mult pie chart
Difference chart
diff chart
Column chart
column chart
BALLOT INTERLOCK LIMITS CHOICES: YES YES NO Main: NO

Runoff: YES
YES
(Choice ranks must differ)
YES
(Choice ranks must differ)
NO NO
BEST NUMBER OF BALLOT CHOICES: 2 2 5 and up 3 and up 2 or 3 2 or 3 Any number Any number
PARTY PRIMARIES NEEDED? YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO
USE EXISTING VOTING MACHINES: YES YES Use at-large method YES NO With great difficulty Use ballot question method NO
CAN BE COUNTED AT THE PRECINCT: YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES
MANY CANDIDATES FAVOR SAME ISSUE: Vote split unfairly Vote split unfairly Vote raised unfairly Vote raised unfairly Vote split reduced Vote split reduced No effect on vote No effect on vote
NONWINNING CANDIDATE RUNS TO CHANGE RESULT: YES YES NO YES YES YES NO NO
ENTERING OR LEAVING CANDIDATE CHANGES RESULT: YES YES NO NO YES YES NO NO
NEGATIVE CAMPAIGN GETS VOTES FOR CAMPAIGNER: YES YES NO YES YES YES NO NO
EFFECT OF MINOR CANDIDATES RUN: Helps opposing major party Helps opposing major party Helps similar major party Helps similar major party Helps opposing major party Helps opposing major party No effect on outcome Lowers score of similar party
VOTER INTENT
VOTING SYSTEM -> PLURALITY


PLURALITY WITH RUNOFF


APPROVAL


APPROVAL WITH RUNOFF


BORDA OR CONDORCET RANKING


INSTANT RUNOFF


INDEPENDENT VOTING


FREE CHOICES RATING


CHARACTERISTIC
DISENFRANCHISED VOTES: Votes for none or many choices Votes for none or many choices Votes for no choice Votes for no choice Equally likes 2 choices Votes for no choice or equally likes 2 choices None None
VOTES AGAINST ALL CHOICES: Disenfranchised Disenfranchised Disenfranchised Disenfranchised Disenfranchised as impossible Disenfranchised as impossible Counted Counted
VOTES FOR MANY CANDIDATES: Disenfranchised Disenfranchised Counted Main: counted

Runoff: thrown out
Disenfranchised as impossible Disenfranchised as impossible Counted Counted
VOTER CAN PICK FAVORITE: Must vote to win instead Must vote to win instead NO Limited YES YES Limited YES
VOTING CAN HURT YOUR CAUSE: NO NO NO NO YES YES NO NO
POSSIBLE WANTS IN 3-WAY RACE: can do 4
can't do 23
of 27 total
can do 4
can't do 23
of 27 total
can do 8
can't do 19
of 27 total
can do 16
can't do 92
of 108 total
can do 6
can't do 21
of 27 total
can do 6
can't do 21
of 27 total
can do 27
can't do 0
of 27 total
can do 1331
can't do 0
of 1331 total
VOTER INTENT PRESERVED: NO NO NO NO NO NO YES YES
VOTER'S CHOICE KEPT FROM BALLOT: YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO
BIAS FROM TYPES OF PEOPLE RUNNING: YES YES YES YES YES YES Less Less
BIASES AND ATTRIBUTES
VOTING SYSTEM -> PLURALITY


PLURALITY WITH RUNOFF


APPROVAL


APPROVAL WITH RUNOFF


BORDA OR CONDORCET RANKING


INSTANT RUNOFF


INDEPENDENT VOTING


FREE CHOICES RATING


CHARACTERISTIC
BIASED TOWARD: Two major parties

The most different choice

Extremists
Two major parties

The most different choice

Extremists
Similar choices

Voters for many choices

Centrists
Minor parties

Centrists
Similar choices

Voters for many choices

Centrist choices
Similar choices

Voters for many choices

Centrist choices
NO bias NO bias
BIASED AGAINST: Minor parties

Similar choices

Centrists
Minor parties

Similar choices

Centrists
Major parties

The most different choice

Extremists
Large parties

The most different choice

Extremists
Extremists

Defined platforms
Extremists

Defined platforms
NO bias NO bias
ADVANTAGES: Already in use. Already in use. More choice.

Won't split voter blocs.
More choice.

Won't split voter blocs.
More choice. More choice. More choice.
Voter control.
Won't split voter blocs.
Used by Congress.
No recounts.
No bias.
More choice.
Voter control.
Won't split voter blocs.
No recounts.
No bias.
DISADVANTAGES: Can't vote NO.

Messes up with 3 or more choices.
Can't vote NO.

Two trips to polls.

2 different setups.
Can't vote NO.

Can't use some machines.
Can't vote NO.

Two trips to polls.

2 different setups.
Can't vote NO.

Can't tell voter like or dislike.

Needs numeric input.

Takes much longer in booth.
Can't vote NO.

Can't tell voter like or dislike.

Needs numeric input.

Takes much longer in booth.
Each choice needs 2 spaces on some machines. Needs numeric input.

Takes much longer in booth.
PROBABILITY OF CONTESTED ELECTION Average Average Above average Average Above average Above average Low High
COMMENTS Politicians and laymen actually think this is fair.

Suppresses "third" parties.
Politicians and laymen actually think this is fair.

Suppresses "third" parties.
Independents actually think this is fair.

Similar to at-large voting.
Independents actually think this is fair. Moderates actually think this is fair. Moderates actually think this is fair. Used by US Congress for internal votes. Most flexible, but costly and complicated.
VOTING SYSTEM -> PLURALITY


PLURALITY WITH RUNOFF


APPROVAL


APPROVAL WITH RUNOFF


BORDA OR CONDORCET RANKING


INSTANT RUNOFF


INDEPENDENT VOTING


FREE CHOICES RATING



LINKS: