They force people in such countries to obey the Islamic Sharia law (the strictest version of Islam).
Those using the phrase are implying that Christians are autocratic and want to control other people.
- Liberals can't think of any other reasons to ban abortion and certain GLBT activities. They see hate everywhere.
- Christians want to save the lives of the unborn. Liberals see the unborn as nothing but "unviable
tissue masses."
- The page author has prenatal memories. Unviable tissue masses would not have these.
- Christians want to keep sexual materials away from children. Liberals want to indoctrinate them in sinful sexual activities.
- Christians want to save lives and protect children. How does this turn into hate?
Liberals keep thinking that Christians want a theocracy - a religious government.
- Maybe some White Supremacists want government to control religion to keep liberal beliefs out.
- Note that nobody can force anyone else to believe in Christ. It is an individual internal choice by each person.
- To most Christians, a Christian theocracy is an unnecessary complication.
- The Taliban also has no power over individual minds to make them believe in their religion.
- Such a theocracy would actually drive people away from Christ.
- What Christians wanted was a Supreme Court free of all activist judges.
- Judicial activists use factors not within the three permitted and necessary sources to
judge by:
- The 3 factors are the Constitution, the law, and facts in the case. Nothing else may be used.
- Wrongful activism uses other factors, such as personal or political beliefs, and public opinion.
- In 1973, activist justices faked a legal basis so they could decide that abortion was a civil right.
- Conservatives and Christians worked to have justices appointed who were not activists.
- In the confirmation hearings, liberals asked how the nominees would vote on certain kinds of cases.
- The nominees said that only activists would be able to answer such a question now. Then they did not answer the questions.
- Nominees said that they could use only the facts, the law, and the Constitution to decide any case.
- They said they would have to see the actual case in entirety to make a decision.
- Answers to the questions Democrats asked indicate judicial activism.
- Liberals screamed that they were not answering the questions because they wanted to hide their biases against liberal court rulings.
- Those non-activist justices overturned Roe v Wade because the 1973 decision had no legal basis.
- Liberals still believe that there was a conspiracy to seat activists to get rid of Roe.
Abortion had nothing to do with why Roe v Wade was overturned. The original 1973 ruling was made through CHEATING by activist justices.
The justices detected the cheating and overturned the ruling. There was no valid legal basis behind the 1973 ruling.
- The real reason Christians oppose abortion is to save the lives of the unborn.
- Liberals don't care what happens to the unborn. They want women to have the License to Kill.
- God said "You shall not murder." We believe this includes abortion.
- Liberals use the 14th amendment text saying who is a citizen to claim the unborn have no rights.
- Liberals want abortion to try to undo their sexual immorality.
- Liberals want GLBT to be a protected class so their sexual immorality can't be called wrongdoing.
- God (in the Bible) prohibited everything that is GLBT as sexual immorality.
- Liberals say those who are genetically or mentally compelled to do things are not culpable for those things
- But people who feel compelled by their mental problems to steal still go to jail. Serial killers go to jail too.
- The only sciences supporting GLBT beliefs are cases of bad science and nondeterministic psychology.
- There are only two genetic sexes: XX and XY. No other combination of chromosomes is viable except XXY.
- XXY is rare. Often the person is sterile, and has many mental and development problems.
- XXY is NOT a GLBT cause. Most GLBT have normal XX or XY chromosome sets.
- Liberals want GLBT to be genetic so it cannot be prohibited by law. But GLBT acts can still be unlawful when they harm others.
- Many religions prohibit many or all GLBT acts as sexual immorality.
- Many GLBT demand that religious people must disobey their own religions to not discriminate against them.
- Liberals want laws passed to make GLBT a protected class (e.g. race, color, religion, and origin).
- Such laws would violate the First Amendment by making some religions illegal.
The people who did the research did not do their science properly.
- Anyone who sets out to prove what he already believes is already doing bad science.
- Many did not use a random sample of the population. Most had no control group.
- Most used wrong statistics for the kind of data they had. They used statistics made for numerical
data on categorical (yes-no) data.
There are three reasons they might have chosen the wrong statistic:
- 1. They did not know they had categorical data or know how to use the correct statistic.
- 2. They wanted the word "correlation". Categorical data gives an "association".
- 3. Their research grant didn't pay for the much larger sample needed with categorical data.
- They concluded what they wanted to conclude, no matter what the results indicated.
- They did not have independent reviews of their experiments. Such reviews would have revealed the bad science.
- The unscientific liberal press believed and embraced their "proofs" because they wanted GLBT to be genetic.
Their religious texts oppose anything GLBT as sexual immorality, a violation of the purposes of their deity.
- Note that several religious texts, including the Old Testament and the Koran, have a death penalty for GLBT acts.
- GLBT is misusing the body, the creation that God gave you.
- GLBT acts transmit diseases that do not normally spread any other way.
- Many GLBT demand that religious people must disobey their own religions to accommodate them.
- Many GLBT demand that schools teach GLBT beliefs, violating many religious beliefs.
- God said "NO!" That should be enough.
- satan uses GLBT to oppose God and to steal souls.
- If any religion requires it, government can't prohibit it.
- If any religion requires it, government can't make it a violation of a member's civil rights.
- If any religion requires that it be done to others, forcing it on others is a violation of civil rights.
- If any religion requires it, nonmembers don't have to obey the requirement.
- If any religion requires it, another religion can prohibit it.
- If any religion requires it, the requirement cannot be called discrimination against the member.
- If any religion requires that it be done to others, forcing it on others is discrimination against them.
- If any religion allows it, but does not require it, government can prohibit it.
- If any religion prohibits it, government can't require it.
- If any religion prohibits it, government can't make it a civil right except as part of another religion.
- If any religion prohibits it, nonmembers don't have to obey the prohibition.
- If any religion prohibits it, another religion can permit or require it.
- If any religion prohibits it, the prohibition cannot be called discrimination.
- Government may not choose a particular sect of a religion to determine this. All versions and sects of a religion must be counted equally.
- Government may not choose a particular translation of a religious text to determine this. All translations must be counted equally.
- Government must not deliberately misread or misinterpret a religious text to be able to require or prohibit anything.
- No person, religion, employer, or government has the right to force any belief onto any other person.
- Government cannot tax any religious activity, work, or property.
An argument has come up where someone claimed abortion bans were unconstitutional because their religion requires abortion.
- Under what horrible circumstances could any religion require an abortion?
- One possibility is an illegitimate child, but no religion uses that.
- The claimants say they are satanists, but does satan actually demand abortions?
- This is similar to child sacrifice. But the US does not allow child sacrifice. Sacrificing a child is forcing the parent's pagan religion onto the child.
- This seems like a liberal trick to get abortion "rights" back.
- None whatsoever. The Taliban is a totalitarian religious theocracy that forces its beliefs onto
everyone.
- There is no way anyone can actually be coerced to believe something.
- They may say they believe it to keep their lives, but most do not actually change their
beliefs.
- Christianity is a belief where everyone has to make his or her own personal choice to accept or deny Christ.
- They hate what Christians believe in.
- They want their abortions and GLBT to be rights. (Such "rights" violate the First Amendment.
- They are acting exactly like the Pharisees, Sadducees, and other Jewish officials did in
Christ's day.
- They want Christianity GONE so they can have abortions and other immorality.
- They couldn't even get rid of Christ in his own day. They killed Him, but he didn't stay dead.