Here is a list of errors I have seen in UFO magazines:
I have the plans. The early Mogul balloon was of made parts of 24 RaWin weather balloons.
The debris in the photo is RaWin balloon debris.
I also used to have some of the decorative wrapping tape with "heiroglyphs".
The cause of the Rendlesham sighting might have been a satellite film drop with info on the Iran Hostage crisis.
Why didn't investigators test the area where the sighting was for evidence and signs of radiation?
Has anyone queried the NRC (then the AEC) about anything nuclear transported in the area?
The pilots said they were flying ultralights, not trainer planes.
Arnold said they flew like saucers skipping on water.
They show the fake version of the photo made a few years later with a dome on top (hubcap).
The theory is that Zamora saw a manned propane hot air balloon with its pilots.
This kind was only two years old in 1964, so it was rare then.
He underestimated the size by saying it looked like a car standing on its end.
Enhance the photos and you find a faint choir behind the lights.
In the Hills case, one of the witnesses said on the hypnosis tape that something was done to please the hypnotist.
Those are computer displays, not video recordings of the object.
What really happened is a RADAR operator used the wrong controls on a refitted RADAR set, causing it to detect weak returns that are normally not displayed.
One pilot following his own radar kept finding his plane aimed at a steamboat on the Potomac.
I did triangulations myself on the images in the videos. The lights were over Gila Bend AZ.
The Maryland National Guard was practicing night air rescue with parachute flares there.
Remember that no human observer without special aids can visually estimate any of these values accurately for any unknown object farther than 30 feet away and seen against the sky: