THE I-69 MESS

HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?

WHOA - IT'S NOT OVER YET!

The I-69 project started off badly, and in the time since 08/01/2018, it has gotten much worse. There are dangerous places on the highway where crashes are more likely because safety was ignored. It takes a long time to either follow the highway or to get from one side of the highway to the other. Also, it takes emergency vehicles much longer to reach a location near the highway, and some must cross county lines to get to certain places in violation of insurance requirements.

"And they tell me, over and over and over and over again... that you can't get there. The road is under construction."

STATUS AS OF 05/21/2018:

Here is the status of the project as it was on 05/21/2018:

HISTORY BEHIND THE MESS:

Here is the history of the problems with the project:

  1. 03/09/2012: The Monroe County government voted to construct I-69 only after INDOT threatened to remove all county project money if they didn't.
  2. 01/2014: Construction starts with a completion date of 10/2016.
  3. Multiple times Democrats badmouthed the bonds to finance the private constructions of I-69 Section 5. This caused bond sales to not raise enough money.
  4. INDOT restricted the private design and construction companies to certain constraints:

    - These constraints caused the project to take longer and cost more.

  5. 04/2014: The state made I-69 Development Partners drill and pay for test bores they were told the state already did. This increased the cost and project time.
  6. 06/2014: Construction workers discovered sinkholes in the path of the project. Environmental mitigation increased the cost and project time.
  7. 06/2014: Monroe County passed a noise ordinance limiting construction work noise to between 6 am and 10 pm, increasing costs, project time, and hazards.
  8. 07/22/2014: INDOT sued Monroe County because the ordinance caused delays and safety hazards. A judge temporarily blocked the noise ordinance.
  9. 08/11/2014: INDOT dropped the lawsuit after Monroe County amended the ordinance.
  10. 2015 and 2016: Unusual multiple heavy rainfalls delayed soil compaction for the overpasses and ramps (wet soil can't be compacted).

    - This caused major delays in construction of the Vernal Pike, Fullerton Pike, and Liberty Church Road overpasses.

  11. 04/13/2016: I-69 Development Partners announced that delays pushed the completion date back to 06/2017.
  12. 09/07/2016: Subcontractors stopped work because they hadn't been paid because the bond sales were too low.
  13. 09/07/2016: Democrat state legislators and the Democrat Bloomington mayor demanded that the state take over the project.
  14. 09/22/2016: The state refused to compensate the contractors for costs caused by the state.
  15. 10/22/2016: The bond rating company downgraded the I-69 bond ratings after hearing the Democrat complaints.
  16. 12/14/2016: I-69 Development Partners announced that delays pushed the completion date back to 10/2017.
  17. 01/19/2017: The Bloomington mayor again questioned the progress of the construction of I-69.
  18. 02/13/2017: I-69 Development Partners and the state announced that delays pushed the completion date back to 05/2018.
  19. 03/2016: Subcontractors stopped work because they hadn't been paid again.
  20. 04/01/2017: The bond rating company downgraded the I-69 bond ratings again. This made it impossible to sell enough bonds to complete the project.
  21. 06/17/2017: The state took over the project effective 07/31/2017 and announced a completion date of 08/31/2018.
  22. 08/2017: Democrats demanded that the project be completed as quickly as possible.
  23. 08/2017: INDOT removed the restrictions they put on the private contractors:

    These constricted traffic to the point that people often can't get to where they are going without hours of delay.

  24. 05/25/2018: Bloomington police had to take over directing traffic at the Third Street interchange because the state did not provide enough open lanes.

    - The Third Street signals restrict westbound cars. The bridge is full when the signal turns green.

    - The bridge allows 4 cars can go, and then the signal turns red.

    - The signals were not retimed as the city promised they would be.

THE THINGS THAT REALLY WENT WRONG:

Here are the causes of some of the worst problems:

  1. politics make mess Democrats opposing all private funding of government projects badmouthed the bonds sold to build I-69.

    - This downgraded the bonds so not enough money was raised.

    - The Democrats got their wish. They ruined the private funding and delayed the project.

    - Democrats were against building I-69 from the beginning, but they were outvoted.

    - When they couldn't stop the project, they made rules that would cause the project to not make the completion date.

    - Democrats demanded that the state must take over the project.

    - Once the state took over, politicians demanded that the construction be finished as soon as possible, causing many closings and restrictions.

    - Where Democrats have control, they are making this project inconvenience as many people as they can.

  2. Federal rules require closing too many lanes:

    There must be a lane closed and filled with drum barricades or a New Jersey barrier between any moving traffic and any of the following:

    - These rules caused the dangerous on-ramp "YIELD" configuration to be used instead of the much safer "MERGE" configuration.

    - They also jammed up more traffic.

  3. dangerous yield ramp Lanes were not changed back to the MERGE configuration even though lanes were available for several days with no work present.

    MERGING TRAFFIC SAFELY

    They didn't want to pay workers extra for the time and labor needed to change the configuration between YIELD and MERGE entrances:

    - This caused the dangerous on-ramp "YIELD" configuration to be used instead of the much safer "MERGE" configuration.

    - Many contractors don't understand the safety difference between the different kinds of entrance ramp treatments.

    - Contractors use the "YIELD" configuration instead of the much safer "MERGE" configuration to save money and labor.

    - Use of the "YIELD" configurations makes selfish drivers on the freeway fail to let in entering traffic.

  4. add lane lane drop sign yield sign
    Contractors want to not have to change the sign configuration when changing the ramp lane configuration.

    - The sign types are (left to right) ADDED LANE, MERGE, and YIELD. They must never be used together.

    - Contractors don't want to pay workers for labor needed to change the signs for each configuration.

    - They don't want to pay for a larger sign inventory.

    - See Merging Traffic Safely.

    - None of these use the same parts. This makes changing the signs for each configuration expensive.

    - Using the YIELD configuration in merges with and without acceleration lanes makes it more dangerous.
        Drivers don't know in advance whether an acceleration lane is there or not, since all of the ramps have YIELD signs.

  5. yield merge ramp Contractors left misleading ADDED LANE, MERGE, or YIELD signs in place, even though they caused hazards:

    - Each of these signs misleads when used with the wrong configuration (right image).

    - They didn't want to pay workers extra for the time and labor needed to do it right.

    - This caused the dangerous on-ramp "YIELD" configuration to be used instead of the much safer "MERGE" configuration.

    - The misleading signs made motorists think a YIELD or MERGE maneuver was not needed when in fact it was.

    - The same signs were left in place when they changed from YIELD to MERGE or from MERGE to YIELD.

  6. Contractors left other misleading signs and lines in place, even though they caused hazards:

    They didn't want to pay workers extra for the time and labor needed to do it right.

  7. Contractors used the wrong signs and devices for the situation, misleading drivers:

    They didn't consult the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) before using the signs and devices.

  8. Contractors did things that inconvenienced drivers for no necessary reason:

EVENTS AFTER 05/21/2018:

Here are the changes after 05/21/2018:

EVENTS AFTER 09/01/2018:

Here are the changes after 09/01/2018:

EVENTS AFTER 12/01/2018:

Here are the changes after 12/01/2018:

EVENTS AFTER 03/18/2019:

Here are the changes after 03/18/2019:

EVENTS AFTER 06/01/2019 - IN-45 / IN-46 Ramp Closures:

Here are the changes after 06/01/2019:

* Official detours must use actual state and US highways, not other surface streets. Turnbacks at Interchanges are an exception.

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSSIBLE FOR A SELF-DRIVING CAR TO SUCCESSFULLY NAVIGATE THIS CONSTRUCTION ZONE.